I touched on thermals for Nvidia's 750 Ti when it was introduced, but now that I've tested a non-reference card the situation is even brighter.
#Nvidia 750 ti vs ati radeon hd 6700 Pc
Not near-silent like the 750 Ti, but if you put this card inside a decent PC case, you'll barely hear it. And with the driver-controlled fan speed at 44% (2696 RPM), external heat and noise were minimal.
#Nvidia 750 ti vs ati radeon hd 6700 1080p
Running a 1080p FurMark stress test, their Radeon 265 never exceeded 62 degrees Celsius. press samples) - but Sapphire does an exceptional job with their thermals. I haven't been able to say this lately - as I've primarily tested AMD's reference cards (i.e. What also becomes apparent is that AMD's claims for the 265 ring true: Perfectly playable gaming - typically 60fps or better - at High quality settings with extra eye candy like Anti-Aliasing enabled. However, turning off PhysX for the Radeon 265 test cranks the average framerate up to 55fps.Īcross the board, we see the Radeon 265 exhibiting 14.6% higher performance than Nvidia's GTX 750 Ti. A notable exception is Metro: Last Light, understandably showing off PhysX better than AMD. While the Nvidia numbers are impressive given the minimal power requirements, AMD's Radeon 265 still trounces the 750 Ti. Gaming Benchmarks: GTX 750 Ti 2GB versus Radeon 265 2GB (Click image for larger version) All tests were run at 1920x1080 resolution. In order to best represent each card's strengths, I included games optimized for both AMD ( Battlefield, Thief, Tomb Raider) and Nvidia ( Batman: Arkham Origins, Assassin's Creed 4, BioShock Infinite), and some optimized for neither ( Total War: Rome II and GRID 2). That card has a ton of overclocking headroom. The takeaway here is that if you opt for the 750 Ti, seek out overclocked versions from PNY or EVGA, or simply do it yourself with EVGA's excellent Precision-X software. I noticed that unlike results with AMD's reference boards and their Hawaii GPUs in general, this card's GPU clock stays locked on target at 925MHz delivering consistent results. But Sapphire's thermal solution with the 265 rocks. This is less a criticism of AMD and more a note of praise directed at Nvidia their Maxwell architecture is setting records for performance-per-watt. Notably, it does this without needing any juice from your power supply, taking only what it needs from the PCI-E lane on your motherboard, while the Radeon 265 requires a single PCI-E connector and pulls about 200W from the wall. But I've pointed out another result: PNY's Overclocked edition of the 750 Ti, which cranks out a 13% higher score than their baseline 2GB 750 Ti, and almost reaches parity with the Radeon 265. As you can see, the Radeon 265 kicks out a 16% higher score, which will end up being in line with my gaming benchmarks. As always I start with Firestrike to establish baseline performance.
0 kommentar(er)
